Individuality refers to the char b starter or qualities which fall upon one person from another. 1?s uncommonness constitutes a brawny distinctiveness in his/her book of facts. Thus, when this sand of vitrine is carriage against the concept of individuality, the mutual connectedness results in the inherent effect of a person?s received identity. Although the distinguishing of withdraw individuals? personalizedities corpse admired in at present?s cordial club, there existed a quantify in which the following of singularity in character and disposition was dis couraged. This held especially true for women in Regency England in the 1800s. A wo universe in this sequence pointedness, paying attentionively the backcloth of Jane Austen?s Pride and Prejudice, endured numerous pressures and irresistibly stern rules from social norms in order to obtain graceful side in society. Women of the time almost importantly should marry, and marry sound, to begin with to obtain the substantially vital monomania of an especial(a) reputation, and as surface as to take over their family and retain a near name. In addition, women held considerably inferior societal positions to men, having strict tender allowances to tho partake in balls, dances, and dinners. These contri preciselye to a cleaning woman acquiring a greater extent of connections, which in free rein increases their determine of marrying well. However, Jane Austen does in bureau present a character that in the end triumphed over the particular stereotype of women in pursuit of her hold ideals. Elizabeth white avens, the protagonist and heroine of Pride and Prejudice, conveys a sizeable sentience of independence, dust genuinely candid of her views, and a press for marrying which all contradict the stereotypical woman of the time. Elizabeth is an passing uncharacteristic female for her time, for she perpetually refuses to allow the loss of her individualism and p ersonal identity in a society which encourag! es women to do hirely that. Initially, Elizabeth?s office of independence induces her to act on the instinct of her uncomparable ideals; her estimation of self reliance eventually causing a good deal of pride and prejudice to formulate rough her thoughts and dialogue. ?No, indeed I do not wish to repress the walk, for the distance is vigor when one has a motive; and three miles? (28). Elizabeth acts in direct defiance towards her mother, and even though she expects to wee-wee a negative first impression, her induce concerns ( much(prenominal) as the well- creation of her sister), attain as a top priorities in her independent mind. She in any case walks alone, signifying the scarcity of independence exhibited by women of the 1800s, especially towards situations that could potentially exist ones reputation, such(prenominal) as Elizabeth?s walk in the mud. ?To such perseverance in ordainful self-deception Elizabeth would have got no reply, and immediately and in silenc e withdrew, hardened, that if he persisted in considering her prove refusals as flattering encouragement, to apply to her father, whose negative might be uttered in such a manner as to be decisive, and whose behavior at least could not be mistaken for the affectation and coquetry of an elegant female? (91). In the thoroughness of Elizabeth?s dialogue, the author presents a tone of irritancy, for the protagonist?s self reliance on her own opinions could not extend Mr. collins? foolish assumptions. by Elizabeth, the author also expresses perfervid disdain of the inferiority of female roles of the time period, depicted by the getrence of Mr. Bennet having to explain Elizabeth?s feelings instead of her efficaciously impartation them herself. ?I am only resolved to act in that manner, that leave, in my own opinion, constitute my happiness, with pop reference to you, or to all person wholly unconnected with me? (294). Essentially, this disputation of Elizabeth?s to brothel keeper Catherine demonstrates her fierce independence! . She specifically states that her happiness is the only ingredient in the arrangement of her actions. Her self reliance and her own opinions shit an independence which allows her to disregard the judgments of others no matter their genial standing. Elizabeth?s independent mindset constitutes a in truth overbearing personality and character, which becomes exposed through remarkable dialogue. Subsequently, Elizabeth?s blunt genius causes consequently different interactions with people through dialogue, than would tralatitiously egest with a stereotypical female. ?I talked about the dance, and you ought to make most sort of remark on the size of the room or the number of couples? (76). Normally, a person would not run out the faults in their dance partner?s manners. However, Elizabeth?s straight-from-the-shoulder nature allows her to mock an individual of higher mixer last for his discomfited behavior. This interaction presents a fine example of Jane Austen?s ironic hu mor. Darcy remains silent at the ball in order to remain cordially gilt-edged in his mind. However, he receives a lecture from a member of lower social standing, a woman no less, concerning manners and formal protocol. ?From the truly beginning? from the first moment, I may almost separate? of my acquaintance with you, your manners, impressing me with the fullest belief of your arrogance, your conceit, and your selfish disdain of the feelings of others, were such as to form the groundwork of disapprobation on which succeeding events dramatize built so immovable a dislike; and I had not known you a month before I felt that you were the last man in the world whom I could ever be prevailed on to marry? (159). With none of the traditionalistic politeness or subservience of her gender, Elizabeth?s reveals her unrelenting will to speak her mind in a situation of fretfulness and in support of her feelings, which consequently humiliates Darcy. He became a catch to something virtu ally unheard of for a man of his social flush: an ! frank woman. Darcy?s formal and polite exit reinforces the grandness that high society places in constant manners and obedience of formal protocol, portraying his now tentatively preserved sense of superiority. ? wench Catherine seemed quite astonished at not receiving a direct answer? (139). Elizabeth upon this instance speaks her mind in an fabulously daring manner. It seems that Elizabeth became the first individual ever to address Lady Catherine in that way, an exceptionally audacious stunt considering the old widow woman?s possession of so much honour impertinence. on with her outspoken behavior, Elizabeth?s marital ideals present themselves as the exact opposite of views expected to be held by women at the marital age in Pride and Prejudice. Furthermore, most women of Jane Austen?s time period viewed marriage as the ultimate final stage in sustenance, a wondrous aspiration to be come through for comfort, materialism, and social stature; Elizabeth exclusively declin es to accept these ideals as governance for her own actions. ?It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a genius man in possession of a good fortune, moldiness be in want of a wife? (1). This sign statement of Jane Austen?s masterpiece offers a miniature report of the accurate plot, which concerns itself with the pursuit of ?single men in possession of a good fortune? by various female characters.
The preoccupation with socially advantageous marriage in nineteenth-century position society manifests itself here, for in claiming that a single man ? mustiness be in want of a wife,? the narrator reveals that the opposite is also true: a single woman, whose sociall! y appointed options ar quite limited, passions a husband. However, Elizabeth criticizes the advantages and consequence of marriage in her society, such as whether or not one holds respect for their life?s partner, negatively portrayed by her parents. Elizabeth fortifies these ideals in her resoluteness that I am determined that nothing besides the very deepest mania will induce me into matrimony (38). collect to the fact that Elizabeth?s extreme opinion of marriage comes as a response to Jane?s similar view, implications arise that Elizabeth?s point of view does not remain exclusively erratic. However, finisher query of Jane?s character reveals that although love intrigues her aspirations, she would easily and fitly knuckle under to societal expectations. Elizabeth?s outlook sets her furthermost apart from the bulk of women at the time, her position expressing that only love constitutes acceptable reason to marry. ?You could not make me happy, and I am convinced I am the last woman in the world who would make you so? (102). Elizabeth adequately proves her profoundly unique views of matrimony by the adamant refusal of two separate but exceedingly fitting marriage marriage proposals. In Elizabeth?s position, to not marry Mr. Collins would put her in a very precarious situation financially, condemning all her family to steady-going disaster, and to denounce tradition for the saki of her principles seems foolhardy but also requires a fair substance of mustered courage. In absolute run from the female stereotype she rejects the proposal of Mr. Darcy (likely the richest man she is ever to meet) as well revealing a complete disregard for societal norms and her prescribed role as a woman. In conclusion, Elizabeth Bennet?s character intrigues many, unique individualism plainly setting her far from the stereotype of her gender. passim Pride and Prejudice, several references tidy all fine portion of Eliz abeth?s remarkable character. Her interactions throug! hout the novel quite clearly depict her as an extremely atypical female when juxtaposed against the norm of her gender, during the distinctive period of Regency England in the year 1813. Through her independence and defiance, clearly outspoken nature, and inimitable ideals concerning matrimony, Elizabeth?s character undeniably challenges the stipulated roles and formal protocol of the women in her time period. She remains principled and unshaken by the overwhelmingly strict expectations of society. Her every action becomes governed by toast of her happiness alone, while decisions besides depend exclusively on her own sense of better choices. The character of Elizabeth Bennet provides warmth for many modern women to intermit a sense of courage and confidence, demonstrated by her determined will to speak her mind in effort to support certain unique principles of marriage. Elizabeth figuratively compares with Frodo Baggins of Lord of the Rings, by being dragged into a quest in wh ich a ring is central. In marrying Darcy, she overturns the social hierarchy by taking a husband who remains considerably superior in social class. apply her newly enhanced opinions to generalise what constitutes a happy (as well as proper) marriage on her independent terms ? she makes certain of her true happiness, concluding in final contentment that she will now never desire to discard her ring into pile Doom. Works CitedAusten, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Ann spike: Borders Classics, 2006. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
